[Python-Dev] Re: [Types-sig] Re: [meta-sig] SIG charters

[Guido van Rossum]

> > > > >     types-sig
> > > > +1
> > >
> > > -1. I think there may come interesting discussions on this list,
> > > when the time is due and things come up. Why dismiss it? It is
> > > a good place to have.
> > >
> > > Sverker Nilsson
> 
> Plus, if you dismiss it I might be tempted to bring my thread about
> multimethods/overload resolution back to this list, and that would be
> messy... it was so neatly killed by diverting it to types-sig. ;-)
> 
> -Dave

I apologize for that!  I had expected that some people on the type-sig
who would be interested.

But it proves that the types-sig is dead.  It's had its chance.  If
there's really a need to revive it, well, there's a procedure for
reviving SIG, too.

--Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/)