[Python-Dev] tiny optimization in ceval mainloop

[Michael Hudson]

"Steve Holden" <sholden@holdenweb.com> writes:

> > A bunch of 0.5% improvements add up.  If there's not much cost in
> > complexity, why not go for it?
> >
> 
> Yeah, right, we just need 200 of them and we're laughing. Computation in
> infinitesimal time.

Multiply up doesn't have the same ring to it, does it?

Cheers,
M.

-- 
  I don't have any special knowledge of all this. In fact, I made all
  the above up, in the hope that it corresponds to reality.
                                            -- Mark Carroll, ucam.chat