[Python-Dev] Great Renaming? What is the goal?

[Fred L. Drake, Jr.]

Peter Funk said:
 > The library documentation provides a existing logical subdivision into 
 > chapters, which group the library into several kinds of services.  
 > IMO this subdivision could be discussed and possibly revised.  
 > But at the moment I got the impression, that it was simply ignored.  
 > Why?  What's so bad with it?  

Ka-Ping Yee writes:
 > I did look at the documentation for some guidance in arranging
 > the modules, though admittedly it didn't direct me much.

  The library reference is pretty well disorganized at this point.  I
want to improve that for the 1.6 docs.
  I received a suggestion a few months back, but haven't had a chance
to dig into it, or even respond to the email.  ;(


  -Fred

--
Fred L. Drake, Jr.	  <fdrake at acm.org>
Corporation for National Research Initiatives