[Python-Dev] Text about cycle GC

Paul Prescod paul@prescod.net
Thu, 29 Jun 2000 06:52:21 -0700


Vladimir Marangozov wrote:
> 
>...
>
> This is risky. We don't have enough experience with this implementation.
> All we know is that things get slower and consume more memory. Without
> a clear picture of the impact of this GC implementation, it's probably
> a bad idea to enable (i.e. impose) it by default.

Won't we have a clear picture by the end of the beta period?

> The "optional experimental feature" label is good and IMO it complies
> with anybody's expectations. Interested people will jump in and will
> eventually contribute with improvements, those who don't care won't
> and will live happily without it (at least until the day the feature
> and its implementation reach their expected maturity).

A million Window users will live unhappily without it because they don't
know how to recompile to get it!

-- 
 Paul Prescod - Not encumbered by corporate consensus
The calculus and the rich body of mathematical analysis to which it 
gave rise made modern science possible, but it was the algorithm that 
made the modern world possible.
	- The Advent of the Algorithm (pending), by David Berlinski