[Python-Dev] list comprehensions again...
Barry A. Warsaw
bwarsaw@beopen.com
Tue, 11 Jul 2000 23:32:41 -0400 (EDT)
>>>>> "PP" == Paul Prescod <paul@prescod.net> writes:
PP> Nevertheless, I think it is worth asking whether a parallel()
PP> or merge() function can do the same thing. It's not like the
PP> semicolon syntax screams out the right answer. The parallel
PP> function could return an iteratable object that generates
PP> tuples on demand. A function can be used in contexts other
PP> than a for loop.
Right. I think I'm beginning to like an explicit function (builtin or
not) better than the syntax change.
-Barry