[Python-Dev] Collection of typedefs for integral types

[Greg Stein]

On Thu, Jul 06, 2000 at 05:37:56PM -0400, Tim Peters wrote:
>...
> My position remains the same:  adopt the C9X names for as many of the new
> integral synonyms as we *need*, but stick "Py_" in front of them.

Why should we insert the Py_ prefix? We can just use autoconf to test for
the types. If present, then we use them. If not, then we define our own
replacements.

I see no particular reason to complicate it with Py_.

Cheers,
-g

-- 
Greg Stein, http://www.lyra.org/