[Python-Dev] test coverage summaries - now updated nightly
Mark Hammond
mhammond@skippinet.com.au
Mon, 3 Jul 2000 16:28:02 +1000
[Skip]
> Mark> It would be great if there was some sort of "multi-platform"
> Mark> support, and a merging of the results.
> Agreed. We could set up a scheme where people run my scripts on other
> systems and then mail me the generated files. Windows would be kind of
> tough though, because my stuff currently relies on gcc/gcov. What
> facilities does Windows have for coverage testing Mark?
There is a source-profiler, but Im not sure how deep it lets you into the
data. I'll look into this at some stage.
Or some people are working towards gcc makefiles for windows - maybe that
is a better way to go for this?
Mark> Along the same vein is the Mozilla "tinderbox". It
...
> That seems a bit extreme to me, and I don't know about you, but
> I don't have
> the spare resources available to "burn" on such a project.
I think that the tinderbox code is open-source too! I agree this is a bit
extreme, but I do believe something like it would be useful, and need not
be too hard. As more and more checkins happen from different people, the
chances of platform-breakage would seem to be quite high.
A Python script that periodically scanned CVS for changes, then executed a
build and did something pretty simple with the log wouldnt be too hard.
However, I do agree we should wait until it is _nearly_ a problem (as
opposed to _is_ a problem :-)
Mark.