[Python-Dev] I'd like list.pop to accept an optional second
Gordon McMillan
gmcm@hypernet.com
Thu, 22 Jul 1999 11:54:58 -0500
Jim Fulton wrote:
>
> Gordon McMillan wrote:
...
> > Violating Pythonic expectations by, in effect, creating 2 methods
> > list.pop(void)
> > list.pop(default_return)
>
> Yes, except that I disagree that this is non-pythonic.
>
I'll leave the final determination to Mr. Python, but I disagree.
Offhand I can't think of a built-in that can't be expressed in normal
Python notation, where "optional" args are really defaulted args.
Which would lead us to either a new list method, or redefining pop:
def pop(usedefault=0, default=None)
and making you use 2 args.
But maybe I've missed a precedent because I'm so used to it. (Hmm, I
guess string.split is a sort-of precedent, because the first default
arg behaves differently than anything you could pass in).
- Gordon