[python-committers] Timeline to vote for a governance PEP

[Antoine Pitrou]

Le 05/11/2018 à 23:08, Victor Stinner a écrit :
> Le sam. 3 nov. 2018 à 10:39, Antoine Pitrou <antoine at python.org> a écrit :
>>> I'm unhappy with the "[] Further discussion" choice. We have a
>>> governance crisis. Many people would like to see it resolved as soon
>>> as possible, I don't see the ability to vote for "[] Further
>>> discussion" as a way to resolve this crisis.
>>
>> Why are you worried?  If many people would like to see the "crisis" (I
>> would call it a void) resolved early, then probably "Further discussion"
>> won't win.  So how is its presence a problem?
> 
> PEPs cannot be approved since July.

Let me repeat the question: if "Further discussion" has no chance of
winning, why are you bothered by its presence?

Regards

Antoine.