[python-committers] 2016 Python Language Summit: Can we get volunteers to talk about pathlib?

[Guido van Rossum]

The primary debate should be about fspath or not. Inheriting from str is
off the table while I'm BDFL. Removing pathlib from the stdlib would only
be on the table if we can't reach agreement on fspath.

On Fri, Apr 29, 2016 at 3:46 PM, Larry Hastings <larry at hastings.org> wrote:

>
>
> This month there were over 350 emails in python-dev with the word
> "pathlib" in the title.  Yet, despite this massive online debate, nobody
> volunteered to present about pathlib at the language summit.
>
> Based on Jake Edge's summary of the conversation from LWN.net we've boiled
> down the debate to these six basic positions.
>
>    1. We should keep pathlib in the standard library.
>    2. We should remove pathlib from the standard library.
>    3. The Path object should inherit from str.
>    4. The Path object shouldn't inherit from str; it should continue to
>    be its own unrelated type.
>    5. We need a new "fspath" protocol.
>    6. We don't need an "fspath" protocol.
>
> We'd like some volunteers to speak on each of these positions.  Speakers
> should plan for a maximum of 2 minutes per position.  After the six
> positions are presented at the summit we'll open the floor for debate.
>
> You're encouraged to volunteer to present more than one!  For example, if
> you think we need the protocol, you're probably pro- keeping the object and
> anti-inherit from str.  (Brett, we're looking at *you.)*
>
> Please note, volunteers should be people who are *already invited to the
> summit*.  We can't invite additional people just for this--and we're
> basically full anyway.
>
>
> Thanks,
>
>
> [BL]arry
>
> p.s. In case you're thinking "That's not fair!  I can't make it to the
> summit, I don't want to get left out of the decision!"  We don't propose to
> make any binding decisions at the summit--unless the BDFL makes
> pronouncements there of course.  This discussion is intended as a quick
> face-to-face debate on the topic, both to inform the delegates at the
> summit, and to possibly find a rough consensus.
>
> p.p.s. If we mischaracterized the debate, and the positions above aren't a
> good distillation, by all means follow up and make a counter-proposal!
> We're listening.
>
> _______________________________________________
> python-committers mailing list
> python-committers at python.org
> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-committers
> Code of Conduct: https://www.python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
>



-- 
--Guido van Rossum (python.org/~guido)
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-committers/attachments/20160429/114cf14b/attachment.html>