[python-committers] Why r69846 is not merged to "release26-maint"?

[Nick Coghlan]

Mark Dickinson wrote:
> Speaking as one of the people who occasionally remembers to backport
> to 3.0 (though clearly I failed with r69846), it wouldn't bother me at all
> if there were no 3.0.2.  I can't speak for any of the other backporters, of
> course.
> 
> I'm not really sure who 3.0.2 would be useful for.

I agree with what Mark has said above (it also means I can just svn
switch my 3.0 checkout to 3.1 rather than adding a 5th local working copy).

Cheers,
Nick.

-- 
Nick Coghlan   |   ncoghlan at gmail.com   |   Brisbane, Australia
---------------------------------------------------------------