[Python-checkins] bpo-37521: No longer treat insertion into sys.modules as optional in importlib examples (GH-14723)

Miss Islington (bot) webhook-mailer at python.org
Fri Jul 12 18:35:43 EDT 2019


https://github.com/python/cpython/commit/0827064c955f88df8ba5621d8e3d81be3cfc26a9
commit: 0827064c955f88df8ba5621d8e3d81be3cfc26a9
branch: master
author: Brett Cannon <54418+brettcannon at users.noreply.github.com>
committer: Miss Islington (bot) <31488909+miss-islington at users.noreply.github.com>
date: 2019-07-12T15:35:34-07:00
summary:

bpo-37521: No longer treat insertion into sys.modules as optional in importlib examples (GH-14723)



Fix importlib examples to insert any newly created modules via importlib.util.module_from_spec() immediately into sys.modules instead of after calling loader.exec_module().

Thanks to Benjamin Mintz for finding the bug.


https://bugs.python.org/issue37521

files:
A Misc/NEWS.d/next/Documentation/2019-07-12-15-09-56.bpo-37521.7tiFR-.rst
M Doc/library/importlib.rst

diff --git a/Doc/library/importlib.rst b/Doc/library/importlib.rst
index df184b33d0e7..9fab0779aa74 100644
--- a/Doc/library/importlib.rst
+++ b/Doc/library/importlib.rst
@@ -1638,15 +1638,16 @@ import, then you should use :func:`importlib.util.find_spec`.
   # For illustrative purposes.
   name = 'itertools'
 
-  spec = importlib.util.find_spec(name)
-  if spec is None:
-      print("can't find the itertools module")
+  if name in sys.modules:
+      print(f"{name!r} already in sys.modules")
+  elif (spec := importlib.util.find_spec(name)) is None:
+      print(f"can't find the {name!r} module")
   else:
       # If you chose to perform the actual import ...
       module = importlib.util.module_from_spec(spec)
-      spec.loader.exec_module(module)
-      # Adding the module to sys.modules is optional.
       sys.modules[name] = module
+      spec.loader.exec_module(module)
+      print(f"{name!r} has been imported")
 
 
 Importing a source file directly
@@ -1665,10 +1666,9 @@ To import a Python source file directly, use the following recipe
 
   spec = importlib.util.spec_from_file_location(module_name, file_path)
   module = importlib.util.module_from_spec(spec)
-  spec.loader.exec_module(module)
-  # Optional; only necessary if you want to be able to import the module
-  # by name later.
   sys.modules[module_name] = module
+  spec.loader.exec_module(module)
+
 
 
 Setting up an importer
@@ -1740,8 +1740,8 @@ Python 3.6 and newer for other parts of the code).
           msg = f'No module named {absolute_name!r}'
           raise ModuleNotFoundError(msg, name=absolute_name)
       module = importlib.util.module_from_spec(spec)
-      spec.loader.exec_module(module)
       sys.modules[absolute_name] = module
+      spec.loader.exec_module(module)
       if path is not None:
           setattr(parent_module, child_name, module)
       return module
diff --git a/Misc/NEWS.d/next/Documentation/2019-07-12-15-09-56.bpo-37521.7tiFR-.rst b/Misc/NEWS.d/next/Documentation/2019-07-12-15-09-56.bpo-37521.7tiFR-.rst
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..35d7f56f732f
--- /dev/null
+++ b/Misc/NEWS.d/next/Documentation/2019-07-12-15-09-56.bpo-37521.7tiFR-.rst
@@ -0,0 +1,5 @@
+Fix `importlib` examples to insert any newly created modules via
+importlib.util.module_from_spec() immediately into sys.modules instead of
+after calling loader.exec_module().
+
+Thanks to Benjamin Mintz for finding the bug.



More information about the Python-checkins mailing list