[Python-checkins] peps: PEP 214, Extended Print Statement, owned by bwarsaw

[georg.brandl]

http://hg.python.org/peps/rev/e06543a34f61
changeset:   33:e06543a34f61
user:        Barry Warsaw <barry at python.org>
date:        Mon Jul 24 17:38:35 2000 +0000
summary:
  PEP 214, Extended Print Statement, owned by bwarsaw

files:
  pep-0214.txt |  153 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
  1 files changed, 153 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)


diff --git a/pep-0214.txt b/pep-0214.txt
new file mode 100644
--- /dev/null
+++ b/pep-0214.txt
@@ -0,0 +1,153 @@
+PEP: 214
+Title: Extended Print Statement
+Version: $Revision$
+Owner: bwarsaw at beopen.com (Barry A. Warsaw)
+Python-Version: 2.0
+Status: Draft
+
+
+
+Introduction
+
+    This PEP describes a syntax to extend the standard `print'
+    statement so that it can be used to print to any file-like object,
+    instead of the default sys.stdout.  This PEP tracks the status and
+    ownership of this feature.  It contains a description of the
+    feature and outlines changes necessary to support the feature.
+    This PEP summarizes discussions held in mailing list forums, and
+    provides URLs for further information, where appropriate.  The CVS
+    revision history of this file contains the definitive historical
+    record.
+
+
+
+Justification
+
+    `print' is a Python keyword and introduces the print statement as
+    described in section 6.6 of the language reference manual[1].
+    The print statement has a number of features:
+
+    - it auto-converts the items to strings
+    - it inserts spaces between items automatically
+    - it appends a newline unless the statement ends in a comma
+
+    The formatting that the print statement performs is limited; for
+    more control over the output, a combination of sys.stdout.write(),
+    and string interpolation can be used.
+
+    The print statement by definition outputs to sys.stdout.  More
+    specifically, sys.stdout must be a file-like object with a write()
+    method, but it can be rebound to redirect output to files other
+    than specifically standard output.  A typical idiom is
+
+	oldstdout = sys.stdout
+        sys.stdout = mylogfile
+	try:
+	    print 'this message goes to my log file'
+	finally:
+	    sys.stdout = oldstdout
+
+    The problem with this approach is that the binding is global, and
+    so affects every statement inside the try: clause.  For example,
+    if we added a call to a function that actually did want to print
+    to stdout, this output too would get redirected to the logfile.
+
+
+
+Proposal
+
+    This proposal introduces a syntax change to the print statement,
+    which allows the programmer to optionally specify the output file
+    target.  An example usage is as follows:
+
+        print >> mylogfile, 'this message goes to my log file'
+
+    Formally, the syntax of the extended print statement is
+
+        print_stmt: "print" [">>" expr ","] [ expr ("," expr)* [","] ]
+
+    Where the the expression just after >> must yield an object with a
+    write() method (i.e. a file-like object).  Thus these two
+    statements are equivalent:
+
+	print 'hello world'
+        print >> sys.stdout, 'hello world'
+
+
+
+Reference Implementation
+
+    A reference implementation, in the form of a patch against the
+    Python 2.0 source tree, is available on SourceForge's patch
+    manager[2].  The approach this patch takes is to introduce two new
+    opcodes, one which temporarily rebinds sys.stdout to the specified
+    file object, performs the print as normal, and then bind
+    sys.stdout back to sys.__stdout__ (which is the real physical
+    standard out and should not be changed).  In some ways this is
+    equivalent to the try/finally idiom above, except that the
+    rebinding of sys.stdout is in effect only for the duration of the
+    print statement itself.
+
+    An alternative approach is possible, where only one new opcode is
+    added.  This opcode would be exactly like the existing PRINT_ITEM
+    opcode except that it would find the target file object at the top
+    of the stack, and use this file instead of digging it out of
+    sys.stdout.
+
+
+
+Alternative Approaches
+
+    An alternative to this syntax change has been proposed (originally
+    by Moshe Zadka) which requires no syntax changes to Python.  A
+    writeln() function could be provided (possibly as a builtin), that
+    would act much like extended print, with a few additional
+    features.
+
+	def writeln(*args, **kws):
+	    import sys
+	    file = sys.stdout
+	    sep = ' '
+	    end = '\n'
+	    if kws.has_key('file'):
+		file = kws['file']
+		del kws['file']
+	    if kws.has_key('nl'):
+		if not kws['nl']:
+		    end = ' '
+		del kws['nl']
+	    if kws.has_key('sep'):
+		sep = kws['sep']
+		del kws['sep']
+	    if kws:
+		raise TypeError('unexpected keywords')
+	    file.write(sep.join(map(str, args)) + end)
+
+    writeln() takes a three optional keyword arguments.  In the
+    context of this proposal, the relevant argument is `file' which
+    can be set to a file-like object with a write() method.  Thus
+
+        print >> mylogfile, 'this goes to my log file'
+
+    would be written as
+
+        writeln('this goes to my log file', file=mylogfile)
+
+    writeln() has the additional functionality that the keyword
+    argument `nl' is a flag specifying whether to append a newline or
+    not, and an argument `sep' which specifies the separator to output
+    in between each item.
+
+
+
+References
+
+    [1] http://www.python.org/doc/current/ref/print.html
+    [2] http://sourceforge.net/patch/download.php?id=100970
+
+
+
+Local Variables:
+mode: indented-text
+indent-tabs-mode: nil
+End:

-- 
Repository URL: http://hg.python.org/peps