[Python-checkins] python/nondist/peps pep-0308.txt,1.18,1.19

[gvanrossum@users.sourceforge.net]

Update of /cvsroot/python/python/nondist/peps
In directory sc8-pr-cvs1:/tmp/cvs-serv23947

Modified Files:
	pep-0308.txt 
Log Message:
Avoid 'I' now there's more than one author.  Other minor nits.


Index: pep-0308.txt
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvsroot/python/python/nondist/peps/pep-0308.txt,v
retrieving revision 1.18
retrieving revision 1.19
diff -C2 -d -r1.18 -r1.19
*** pep-0308.txt	13 Feb 2003 06:59:58 -0000	1.18
--- pep-0308.txt	13 Feb 2003 15:01:53 -0000	1.19
***************
*** 3,7 ****
  Version: $Revision$
  Last-Modified: $Date$
! Author: Guido van Rossum and Raymond D. Hettinger
  Status: Draft
  Type: Standards Track
--- 3,7 ----
  Version: $Revision$
  Last-Modified: $Date$
! Author: Guido van Rossum, Raymond D. Hettinger
  Status: Draft
  Type: Standards Track
***************
*** 19,25 ****
      in Python 2.4.  If not, the PEP will be augmented with a summary
      of the reasons for rejection and the subject better not come up
!     again.  While I am the author of this PEP, I am neither in favor
!     nor against this proposal; it is up to the community to decide.
!     If the community can't decide, I'll reject the PEP.
  
      After unprecedented community response (very good arguments were
--- 19,26 ----
      in Python 2.4.  If not, the PEP will be augmented with a summary
      of the reasons for rejection and the subject better not come up
!     again.  While the BDFL is co-author of this PEP, he is neither in
!     favor nor against this proposal; it is up to the community to
!     decide.  If the community can't decide, the BDFL will reject the
!     PEP.
  
      After unprecedented community response (very good arguments were
***************
*** 212,216 ****
         valid for file objects.
  
!     Supporters of a cond() function point-out that the need for
      short-circuit evaluation is rare.  Scanning through existing code
      directories, they found that if/else did not occur often; and of
--- 213,217 ----
         valid for file objects.
  
!     Supporters of a cond() function point out that the need for
      short-circuit evaluation is rare.  Scanning through existing code
      directories, they found that if/else did not occur often; and of