From jeremy.kloth at gmail.com Sat Jun 9 02:34:22 2018 From: jeremy.kloth at gmail.com (Jeremy Kloth) Date: Sat, 9 Jun 2018 00:34:22 -0600 Subject: [Python-buildbots] Filtering build triggers Message-ID: Would it be possible to add a filter to the build trigger that would skip documentation only changes like the configuration for AppVeyor? (see .github/appveyor.yml) To my knowledge, we don't have any tests dependent on the contents of documentation sources. This would really increase the availability of the workers (especially the slower ones). Ideally, this could be implemented server-side so as to eliminate "false" successes. I would think that this would help those watching the buildbots (Victor!) for erroneous commits. -- Jeremy Kloth From zachary.ware+pydev at gmail.com Sat Jun 9 10:48:04 2018 From: zachary.ware+pydev at gmail.com (Zachary Ware) Date: Sat, 9 Jun 2018 09:48:04 -0500 Subject: [Python-buildbots] Filtering build triggers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: On Sat, Jun 9, 2018 at 1:34 AM, Jeremy Kloth wrote: > Would it be possible to add a filter to the build trigger that would > skip documentation only changes like the configuration for AppVeyor? > (see .github/appveyor.yml) To my knowledge, we don't have any tests > dependent on the contents of documentation sources. This would really > increase the availability of the workers (especially the slower ones). > > Ideally, this could be implemented server-side so as to eliminate > "false" successes. I would think that this would help those watching > the buildbots (Victor!) for erroneous commits. This should already be implemented. See here: https://github.com/python/buildmaster-config/blob/56aa6ddc4333cb0829eb90847a4c89c90a5d4db4/master/master.cfg#L524-L537 -- Zach From jeremy.kloth at gmail.com Sat Jun 9 11:15:26 2018 From: jeremy.kloth at gmail.com (Jeremy Kloth) Date: Sat, 9 Jun 2018 09:15:26 -0600 Subject: [Python-buildbots] Filtering build triggers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: On Sat, Jun 9, 2018 at 8:48 AM Zachary Ware wrote: > This should already be implemented. See here: > https://github.com/python/buildmaster-config/blob/56aa6ddc4333cb0829eb90847a4c89c90a5d4db4/master/master.cfg#L524-L537 Ah, I did miss that. However it is a different set of filters than exist in the travis and appveyor configs. Most notably it does miss *.rst files not residing in those directories. Here is a list of (some) of the doc-only changes missed by the current filter implementation: http://buildbot.python.org/all/#/builders/17/builds/114 http://buildbot.python.org/all/#/builders/130/builds/30 http://buildbot.python.org/all/#/builders/130/builds/29 http://buildbot.python.org/all/#/builders/40/builds/414 http://buildbot.python.org/all/#/builders/17/builds/116 -- Jeremy Kloth From zachary.ware+pydev at gmail.com Sat Jun 9 13:56:25 2018 From: zachary.ware+pydev at gmail.com (Zachary Ware) Date: Sat, 9 Jun 2018 12:56:25 -0500 Subject: [Python-buildbots] Filtering build triggers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: On Sat, Jun 9, 2018 at 10:15 AM, Jeremy Kloth wrote: > On Sat, Jun 9, 2018 at 8:48 AM Zachary Ware > wrote: >> This should already be implemented. See here: >> https://github.com/python/buildmaster-config/blob/56aa6ddc4333cb0829eb90847a4c89c90a5d4db4/master/master.cfg#L524-L537 > > Ah, I did miss that. However it is a different set of filters than > exist in the travis and appveyor configs. Most notably it does miss > *.rst files not residing in those directories. > > Here is a list of (some) of the doc-only changes missed by the current > filter implementation: > > http://buildbot.python.org/all/#/builders/17/builds/114 > http://buildbot.python.org/all/#/builders/130/builds/30 > http://buildbot.python.org/all/#/builders/130/builds/29 > http://buildbot.python.org/all/#/builders/40/builds/414 > http://buildbot.python.org/all/#/builders/17/builds/116 Good point. I've expanded the definition of an unimportant file, see https://github.com/python/buildmaster-config/pull/38/files which is now deployed. -- Zach From jeremy.kloth at gmail.com Sat Jun 9 14:48:01 2018 From: jeremy.kloth at gmail.com (Jeremy Kloth) Date: Sat, 9 Jun 2018 12:48:01 -0600 Subject: [Python-buildbots] Filtering build triggers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: On Sat, Jun 9, 2018 at 11:56 AM Zachary Ware wrote: > Good point. I've expanded the definition of an unimportant file, see > https://github.com/python/buildmaster-config/pull/38/files which is > now deployed. Thanks, that should eliminate most all false builds. -- Jeremy Kloth From vstinner at redhat.com Wed Jun 20 06:07:59 2018 From: vstinner at redhat.com (Victor Stinner) Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2018 12:07:59 +0200 Subject: [Python-buildbots] Add a new buildbot running tests with -Werror? Message-ID: Hi, It's common that we introduce regressions when tests are run with -Werror: https://bugs.python.org/issue33613 https://bugs.python.org/issue33911 https://bugs.python.org/issue33912 Is there someone interested to modify an existing buildbot or maybe even add a new one to run tests with -Werror? Maybe it can wait until these 3 issues are fixed in the master branch. Victor From nad at python.org Sat Jun 23 19:49:38 2018 From: nad at python.org (Ned Deily) Date: Sat, 23 Jun 2018 19:49:38 -0400 Subject: [Python-buildbots] edelsohn-fedora-ppc64le buildbot failures? Message-ID: <138CB900-440A-4A0B-8D67-6051B5BA3F86@python.org> David: I notice that starting sometime within the past 24 hours all of the buildbots on the edelsohn-fedora-ppc64le host are now catastrophically failing. Any idea what's going on there? Thanks! --Ned http://buildbot.python.org/all/#/workers/3 -- Ned Deily nad at python.org -- [] From dje.gcc at gmail.com Sat Jun 23 21:23:00 2018 From: dje.gcc at gmail.com (David Edelsohn) Date: Sat, 23 Jun 2018 21:23:00 -0400 Subject: [Python-buildbots] edelsohn-fedora-ppc64le buildbot failures? In-Reply-To: <138CB900-440A-4A0B-8D67-6051B5BA3F86@python.org> References: <138CB900-440A-4A0B-8D67-6051B5BA3F86@python.org> Message-ID: The system at OSUOSL seems to have experienced a catastrophic failures. - David On Sat, Jun 23, 2018 at 7:49 PM Ned Deily wrote: > > David: > > I notice that starting sometime within the past 24 hours all of the buildbots on the edelsohn-fedora-ppc64le host are now catastrophically failing. Any idea what's going on there? > > Thanks! > --Ned > > http://buildbot.python.org/all/#/workers/3 > > -- > Ned Deily > nad at python.org -- [] > From taleinat at gmail.com Sat Jun 30 14:07:30 2018 From: taleinat at gmail.com (Tal Einat) Date: Sat, 30 Jun 2018 21:07:30 +0300 Subject: [Python-buildbots] Any interest in an Intel Ubuntu buildbot? Message-ID: My home file-server is an Intel NUC with a Celeron CPU running Ubuntu 16.04. It compiles and runs Python just fine. It is always on (>99% uptime). Would you like me to set it up as another buildbot in our fleet? - Tal Einat