From zachary.ware+pydev at gmail.com  Mon Aug  1 11:09:16 2016
From: zachary.ware+pydev at gmail.com (Zachary Ware)
Date: Mon, 1 Aug 2016 10:09:16 -0500
Subject: [Python-buildbots] adding "installed Python" buildbots to the
 stable list
In-Reply-To: <d1f36e33-229d-825c-e67b-7b3f5f7ef328@gmail.com>
References: <d1f36e33-229d-825c-e67b-7b3f5f7ef328@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CAKJDb-OR4x7p1eqDBnjF53r-RrnJiT-+Y3S4JB+=0XReN01PxA@mail.gmail.com>

On Sat, Jul 30, 2016 at 10:41 AM, Xavier de Gaye <xdegaye at gmail.com> wrote:
> Maybe the problems in issue 23968 [1] could have been detected earlier
> if the Gentoo "installed Python" buildbots setup by Zachary had been
> on the stable list.

I had planned a few months ago to completely rework the stable set,
but that hasn't actually happened yet.  There was no disagreement with
adding more bots to the stable set when I brought it up, though, so
I'm just going to go through and flip a few of the stable unstables to
stable.  If anyone takes exception to the changes I make, or has
suggestions for other changes, please speak up :).

-- 
Zach

From rosuav at gmail.com  Mon Aug  1 13:01:59 2016
From: rosuav at gmail.com (Chris Angelico)
Date: Tue, 2 Aug 2016 03:01:59 +1000
Subject: [Python-buildbots] adding "installed Python" buildbots to the
 stable list
In-Reply-To: <CAKJDb-OR4x7p1eqDBnjF53r-RrnJiT-+Y3S4JB+=0XReN01PxA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <d1f36e33-229d-825c-e67b-7b3f5f7ef328@gmail.com>
 <CAKJDb-OR4x7p1eqDBnjF53r-RrnJiT-+Y3S4JB+=0XReN01PxA@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CAPTjJmpTK_4LAx=Og6LkwQtWpXV37y_1A_Mxkkb2h1LjOVFySQ@mail.gmail.com>

On Tue, Aug 2, 2016 at 1:09 AM, Zachary Ware
<zachary.ware+pydev at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 30, 2016 at 10:41 AM, Xavier de Gaye <xdegaye at gmail.com> wrote:
>> Maybe the problems in issue 23968 [1] could have been detected earlier
>> if the Gentoo "installed Python" buildbots setup by Zachary had been
>> on the stable list.
>
> I had planned a few months ago to completely rework the stable set,
> but that hasn't actually happened yet.  There was no disagreement with
> adding more bots to the stable set when I brought it up, though, so
> I'm just going to go through and flip a few of the stable unstables to
> stable.  If anyone takes exception to the changes I make, or has
> suggestions for other changes, please speak up :).

LGTM. Which ones are getting promoted?

ChrisA

From zachary.ware+pydev at gmail.com  Mon Aug  1 13:17:14 2016
From: zachary.ware+pydev at gmail.com (Zachary Ware)
Date: Mon, 1 Aug 2016 12:17:14 -0500
Subject: [Python-buildbots] adding "installed Python" buildbots to the
 stable list
In-Reply-To: <CAPTjJmpTK_4LAx=Og6LkwQtWpXV37y_1A_Mxkkb2h1LjOVFySQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <d1f36e33-229d-825c-e67b-7b3f5f7ef328@gmail.com>
 <CAKJDb-OR4x7p1eqDBnjF53r-RrnJiT-+Y3S4JB+=0XReN01PxA@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAPTjJmpTK_4LAx=Og6LkwQtWpXV37y_1A_Mxkkb2h1LjOVFySQ@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CAKJDb-OL5ZHyJoUMa5hXY9n=1aY0QzLW2Fbz+uBNDrZz-TbDGg@mail.gmail.com>

On Mon, Aug 1, 2016 at 12:01 PM, Chris Angelico <rosuav at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 2, 2016 at 1:09 AM, Zachary Ware
> <zachary.ware+pydev at gmail.com> wrote:
>> I had planned a few months ago to completely rework the stable set,
>> but that hasn't actually happened yet.  There was no disagreement with
>> adding more bots to the stable set when I brought it up, though, so
>> I'm just going to go through and flip a few of the stable unstables to
>> stable.  If anyone takes exception to the changes I make, or has
>> suggestions for other changes, please speak up :).
>
> LGTM. Which ones are getting promoted?

It's done, see if you can tell ;)

Off the top of my head, both of my Gentoo-based bots
(non-debug/installed and docs), your root builder, gps's PGO builder,
bolen-tiger, koobs-freebsd-current, bolen-windows8, and all of the
edelsohn linux bots.  If I ever get my non-debug Windows bot running
again (stably), I'll add it as well.

Note that several of the stable builders are currently legitimately red.

-- 
Zach

From dje.gcc at gmail.com  Mon Aug  1 13:20:06 2016
From: dje.gcc at gmail.com (David Edelsohn)
Date: Mon, 1 Aug 2016 13:20:06 -0400
Subject: [Python-buildbots] adding "installed Python" buildbots to the
 stable list
In-Reply-To: <CAKJDb-OL5ZHyJoUMa5hXY9n=1aY0QzLW2Fbz+uBNDrZz-TbDGg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <d1f36e33-229d-825c-e67b-7b3f5f7ef328@gmail.com>
 <CAKJDb-OR4x7p1eqDBnjF53r-RrnJiT-+Y3S4JB+=0XReN01PxA@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAPTjJmpTK_4LAx=Og6LkwQtWpXV37y_1A_Mxkkb2h1LjOVFySQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAKJDb-OL5ZHyJoUMa5hXY9n=1aY0QzLW2Fbz+uBNDrZz-TbDGg@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CAGWvnymAKUdb7cJWf-JsmOq+spPvH8cYE8YFqrLmsK47n5y1ug@mail.gmail.com>

Great!

Thanks for including the PPC64 Linux and s390x Linux systems.

- David


On Mon, Aug 1, 2016 at 1:17 PM, Zachary Ware
<zachary.ware+pydev at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 1, 2016 at 12:01 PM, Chris Angelico <rosuav at gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Tue, Aug 2, 2016 at 1:09 AM, Zachary Ware
>> <zachary.ware+pydev at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> I had planned a few months ago to completely rework the stable set,
>>> but that hasn't actually happened yet.  There was no disagreement with
>>> adding more bots to the stable set when I brought it up, though, so
>>> I'm just going to go through and flip a few of the stable unstables to
>>> stable.  If anyone takes exception to the changes I make, or has
>>> suggestions for other changes, please speak up :).
>>
>> LGTM. Which ones are getting promoted?
>
> It's done, see if you can tell ;)
>
> Off the top of my head, both of my Gentoo-based bots
> (non-debug/installed and docs), your root builder, gps's PGO builder,
> bolen-tiger, koobs-freebsd-current, bolen-windows8, and all of the
> edelsohn linux bots.  If I ever get my non-debug Windows bot running
> again (stably), I'll add it as well.
>
> Note that several of the stable builders are currently legitimately red.
>
> --
> Zach
> _______________________________________________
> Python-Buildbots mailing list
> Python-Buildbots at python.org
> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-buildbots

From rosuav at gmail.com  Mon Aug  1 13:28:11 2016
From: rosuav at gmail.com (Chris Angelico)
Date: Tue, 2 Aug 2016 03:28:11 +1000
Subject: [Python-buildbots] adding "installed Python" buildbots to the
 stable list
In-Reply-To: <CAKJDb-OL5ZHyJoUMa5hXY9n=1aY0QzLW2Fbz+uBNDrZz-TbDGg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <d1f36e33-229d-825c-e67b-7b3f5f7ef328@gmail.com>
 <CAKJDb-OR4x7p1eqDBnjF53r-RrnJiT-+Y3S4JB+=0XReN01PxA@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAPTjJmpTK_4LAx=Og6LkwQtWpXV37y_1A_Mxkkb2h1LjOVFySQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAKJDb-OL5ZHyJoUMa5hXY9n=1aY0QzLW2Fbz+uBNDrZz-TbDGg@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CAPTjJmpo4xLGQpaLwf=uZfghapw0V1=mz4BAycZAxG0BmUhd0g@mail.gmail.com>

On Tue, Aug 2, 2016 at 3:17 AM, Zachary Ware
<zachary.ware+pydev at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 1, 2016 at 12:01 PM, Chris Angelico <rosuav at gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Tue, Aug 2, 2016 at 1:09 AM, Zachary Ware
>> <zachary.ware+pydev at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> I had planned a few months ago to completely rework the stable set,
>>> but that hasn't actually happened yet.  There was no disagreement with
>>> adding more bots to the stable set when I brought it up, though, so
>>> I'm just going to go through and flip a few of the stable unstables to
>>> stable.  If anyone takes exception to the changes I make, or has
>>> suggestions for other changes, please speak up :).
>>
>> LGTM. Which ones are getting promoted?
>
> It's done, see if you can tell ;)

Hah! I didn't think to, yaknow, go look, did I!

> Off the top of my head, both of my Gentoo-based bots
> (non-debug/installed and docs), your root builder, gps's PGO builder,
> bolen-tiger, koobs-freebsd-current, bolen-windows8, and all of the
> edelsohn linux bots.  If I ever get my non-debug Windows bot running
> again (stably), I'll add it as well.

Cool! A glance at the current stables looks rather pretty... colourful
at the moment, though. I'm not sure which ones are new, but there are
definitely several more than there used to be.

ChrisA

From ncoghlan at gmail.com  Mon Aug  1 23:33:17 2016
From: ncoghlan at gmail.com (Nick Coghlan)
Date: Tue, 2 Aug 2016 13:33:17 +1000
Subject: [Python-buildbots] adding "installed Python" buildbots to the
 stable list
In-Reply-To: <CAPTjJmpo4xLGQpaLwf=uZfghapw0V1=mz4BAycZAxG0BmUhd0g@mail.gmail.com>
References: <d1f36e33-229d-825c-e67b-7b3f5f7ef328@gmail.com>
 <CAKJDb-OR4x7p1eqDBnjF53r-RrnJiT-+Y3S4JB+=0XReN01PxA@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAPTjJmpTK_4LAx=Og6LkwQtWpXV37y_1A_Mxkkb2h1LjOVFySQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAKJDb-OL5ZHyJoUMa5hXY9n=1aY0QzLW2Fbz+uBNDrZz-TbDGg@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAPTjJmpo4xLGQpaLwf=uZfghapw0V1=mz4BAycZAxG0BmUhd0g@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CADiSq7dF1-qORNDsgy+p7JswL3mzVdgD5bGmTRPbXO8-+SsCTA@mail.gmail.com>

On 2 August 2016 at 03:28, Chris Angelico <rosuav at gmail.com> wrote:
> Cool! A glance at the current stables looks rather pretty... colourful
> at the moment, though.

The new tests for PEP 495's local time disambiguation flushed out some
underlying issues in the timezone database:
http://bugs.python.org/issue24773#msg271313

> I'm not sure which ones are new, but there are
> definitely several more than there used to be.

Definitely a nice mix of distros and architectures on the Linux side
of things now.

Cheers,
Nick.

-- 
Nick Coghlan   |   ncoghlan at gmail.com   |   Brisbane, Australia

From dje.gcc at gmail.com  Mon Aug  8 13:35:21 2016
From: dje.gcc at gmail.com (David Edelsohn)
Date: Mon, 8 Aug 2016 13:35:21 -0400
Subject: [Python-buildbots] Debian s390x buildbot upgrade
Message-ID: <CAGWvnykR1k+tMdmSuGPU3jfH3r3eaaQDSS+n_UDyuUvJ+yfk6g@mail.gmail.com>

I have updated the Debian s390x buildbot to a fresh install of Debien
jessie.  Let me know if you see any problems.

Thanks, David

From dje.gcc at gmail.com  Tue Aug  9 20:08:00 2016
From: dje.gcc at gmail.com (David Edelsohn)
Date: Tue, 9 Aug 2016 20:08:00 -0400
Subject: [Python-buildbots] AIX PPC64 buildslave upgrade
Message-ID: <CAGWvnymQUrECZTOOaYyTz+EdsWUb8EfgR3fL26nmM7wi7+24-w@mail.gmail.com>

I have moved the Python buildslave for AIX to the new POWER8 system
running AIX 7.2 with new Open Source packages.  We'll see if this
release of AIX fixes any of the testsuite failures due to AIX.

Let me know if there are any problems related to the new buildbot.

Thanks, David