[issue40640] Tutorial for Continue missing ... line

Sat May 23 04:33:11 EDT 2020

Chas Belov <docorbit at sonic.net> added the comment:

@DahlitzFlorian: I'm happy do to the PR provided I don't actually have to build Python to work on a documentation change. If it does require building Python then please go ahead.

That said, I've looked at the Doc/tutorial/controlflow.rst and it appears to be a plain text file. I believe that I would have a PR up by May 26, 2020. Is the best practice to check out the 3.10 branch then add backport tags for the other versions to the PR? That wasn't clear to me from the docs you referred me to.

----------

_______________________________________
Python tracker <report at bugs.python.org>
<https://bugs.python.org/issue40640>
_______________________________________