[issue35967] Better platform.processor support

[Marc-Andre Lemburg]

Marc-Andre Lemburg <mal at egenix.com> added the comment:

Reopening the ticket, since the implementation makes backwards incompatible changes to platform.uname(): see https://bugs.python.org/issue40570 for a discussion on a better approach to lazy evaluation of getting the processor information.

Before we head on into implementation details, could you please point me to the motivation why only the processor detail of uname() needs lazy evaluation ?

Thanks.

----------
resolution: fixed -> 
status: closed -> open

_______________________________________
Python tracker <report at bugs.python.org>
<https://bugs.python.org/issue35967>
_______________________________________