[issue41246] IOCP Proactor same socket overlapped callbacks

[Jim Jewett]

Jim Jewett <jimjjewett at gmail.com> added the comment:

Looks good to me.  

I at first worried that the different function names were useful metadata that was getting lost -- but the names were already duplicated in several cases.  *If* that is still a concern for the committer, then instead of repeating the code (as current production does), each section should just say newname=origname before registering the static method (as the patch does), and should bind a distinct name for each usage.

----------
nosy: +Jim.Jewett
versions: +Python 3.10

_______________________________________
Python tracker <report at bugs.python.org>
<https://bugs.python.org/issue41246>
_______________________________________