[issue39511] [subinterpreters] Per-interpreter singletons (None, True, False, etc.)

[STINNER Victor]

STINNER Victor <vstinner at python.org> added the comment:

> Would it not suffice to just make the singletons "immortal"?

The problem is to make Py_INCREF/Py_DECREF efficient. Last time someone tried to use an atomic variable for ob_refcnt, it was 20% slower if I recall correctly. If many threads start to update such atomic variable, the CPU cacheline of common singletons like None, True and False can quickly become a performance bottleneck.

On the other side, if each interpreter has its own objects, there is no need to protect ob_refcnt, the interpreter lock protects it.

----------

_______________________________________
Python tracker <report at bugs.python.org>
<https://bugs.python.org/issue39511>
_______________________________________