[issue31520] ResourceWarning: unclosed <socket.socket [closed] fd=3, ...> warning

STINNER Victor report at bugs.python.org
Tue Sep 19 12:30:09 EDT 2017


New submission from STINNER Victor:

_socket.socket object destructor emits a ResourceWarning if the socket is not closed. 

The problem is this warning:

build/Lib/contextlib.py:60: ResourceWarning: unclosed <socket.socket [closed] fd=3, family=AddressFamily.AF_INET, type=2049, proto=6>
  self.gen = func(*args, **kwds)

The message says "unclosed" and "closed" in the same sentence. It's confusing.

In fact, the Python module "socket" has a socket.socket class based on the _socket.socket of the C module "_socket".

The Python module has a private _closed attribute set to True as soon as close() was closed. *But* the underlying _socket.socket.close() is only called once the "io refs" counter reachs zero.

The Python module allows to open to "fork" the socket using the makefile() method: the "io refs" counter is increased in that case. makefile() creates a raw socket.SocketIO() object which will call the close() method of the original socket.

Ok, let's come back at the C level. The _socket.socket destructor checks if _socket.socket.close() was called to decide if the ResourceWarning should be emitted or not.

Maybe SocketIO should raise the ResourceWarning?

IMHO the minimum patch is to modify socket.socket.__repr__() to include the "io refs" counter. So a developer knowing the implementation can understand the surprising warning.

----------
components: Library (Lib)
messages: 302541
nosy: haypo
priority: normal
severity: normal
status: open
title: ResourceWarning: unclosed <socket.socket [closed] fd=3, ...> warning
versions: Python 3.7

_______________________________________
Python tracker <report at bugs.python.org>
<https://bugs.python.org/issue31520>
_______________________________________


More information about the Python-bugs-list mailing list