[issue28870] Reduce stack consumption of PyObject_CallFunctionObjArgs() and like
STINNER Victor
report at bugs.python.org
Mon Jan 9 12:28:49 EST 2017
STINNER Victor added the comment:
Impact of the _PY_FASTCALL_SMALL_STACK constant:
* _PY_FASTCALL_SMALL_STACK=1: 528 bytes/call
test_python_call 7376
test_python_getitem 6544
test_python_iterator 5572
=> total: 19 492
* _PY_FASTCALL_SMALL_STACK=3: 528 bytes/call
test_python_call 7272
test_python_getitem 6464
test_python_iterator 5512
=> total: 19 248
* _PY_FASTCALL_SMALL_STACK=5 (current value): 560 bytes/call
test_python_call 7172
test_python_getitem 6232
test_python_iterator 5344
=> total: 19 636
* _PY_FASTCALL_SMALL_STACK=10: 592 bytes/call
test_python_call 6984
test_python_getitem 5952
test_python_iterator 5132
=> total: 18 068
Increasing _PY_FASTCALL_SMALL_STACK has a clear effect on the total. Total decreases when _PY_FASTCALL_SMALL_STACK increases.
---
no_small_stack.patch with _PY_FASTCALL_SMALL_STACK=3: 368 bytes/call
test_python_call 7272
test_python_getitem 6628
test_python_iterator 5632
=> total: 19 532
----------
_______________________________________
Python tracker <report at bugs.python.org>
<http://bugs.python.org/issue28870>
_______________________________________
More information about the Python-bugs-list
mailing list