[issue32361] global / nonlocal interference : is this a bug, a feature or a design hole ?

[Stefan Krah]

Stefan Krah <stefan at bytereef.org> added the comment:

> Stefan, your last example is formally speaking OK, if one reads the "Execution model" literally. The original example is however too
+ambiguous, so it is good that it triggers an error.

OK yes -- desirable, no. IMO execution models are not a great definition for scoping.

It certainly prevents Python scopes from being called "lexical scopes".

----------

_______________________________________
Python tracker <report at bugs.python.org>
<https://bugs.python.org/issue32361>
_______________________________________