[issue28498] tk busy command

[klappnase]

klappnase added the comment:

Hi Serhiy,

thanks for the feedback.

"+    def tk_busy(self, **kw):

Shouldn't it be just an alias to tk_busy_hold?"

Not sure, I figured since it is a separate command in tk I would make it a separate command in Python, too.

"+    def tk_busy_hold(self, **kw):

Since the only supported option is cursor, just declare it.

    def tk_busy_hold(self, cursor=None):
"

I thought so at first, too, but is this really wise, since if future versions of tk add other options another patch would be required?

----------

_______________________________________
Python tracker <report at bugs.python.org>
<http://bugs.python.org/issue28498>
_______________________________________