[issue26341] Implement free-list for single-digit longs

Yury Selivanov report at bugs.python.org
Thu Feb 11 14:22:36 EST 2016


New submission from Yury Selivanov:

The attached patch implements a free-list for single-digit longs.  We already have free lists for many fundamental types, such as floats & unicode.

The patch improves performance in micro-benchmarks by 10-20%.  It'll also lessen memory fragmentation issues.


== Benchmarks ==

### spectral_norm ###
Min: 0.268018 -> 0.245042: 1.09x faster
Avg: 0.289548 -> 0.257861: 1.12x faster
Significant (t=18.82)
Stddev: 0.01004 -> 0.00640: 1.5680x smaller

-m timeit -s "loops=tuple(range(1000))" "for x in loops: x+x"
with patch: 34.5 usec           without patch: 45.9 usec


== Why only single-digit? ==

I've also a patch that implements free-lists for 1-digit, 2-digits and 3-digits longs, and collects statistics on them.  It looks like we only want to optimize 1-digit longs:

* 2to3 benchmark (the first number is the number of all N-digit longs, the second number is the number of longs created via free-list):

===> d1_longs = 142384 124759
===> d2_longs = 6872 6264
===> d3_longs = 2907 2834

* richards:
===> d1_longs = 219630 219033
===> d2_longs = 1455 1096
===> d3_longs = 630 627

* spectral_norm:
===> d1_longs = 133928432 133927838
===> d2_longs = 1471 1113
===> d3_longs = 630 627

----------
assignee: yselivanov
components: Interpreter Core
files: long_fl.patch
keywords: patch
messages: 260124
nosy: haypo, mark.dickinson, serhiy.storchaka, yselivanov
priority: normal
severity: normal
stage: patch review
status: open
title: Implement free-list for single-digit longs
type: performance
versions: Python 3.6
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file41900/long_fl.patch

_______________________________________
Python tracker <report at bugs.python.org>
<http://bugs.python.org/issue26341>
_______________________________________


More information about the Python-bugs-list mailing list