[issue29102] Add an id field to PyInterpreterState.

[Eric Snow]

Eric Snow added the comment:

Thanks for pointing that out, Victor.  Given the precedent I switched to using int64_t.  The patch actually uses PY_INT64_T, but I didn't see a reason to use int64_t directly.  FWIW, there *are* a few places that use int_fast64_t, but they are rather specialized and I didn't want this patch to be a place where I had to deal with setting a more general precedent. :)

----------
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file46105/interpreter-id-4.diff

_______________________________________
Python tracker <report at bugs.python.org>
<http://bugs.python.org/issue29102>
_______________________________________