[issue2292] Missing *-unpacking generalizations

[Guido van Rossum]

Guido van Rossum added the comment:

(To clarify, the PEP itself probably serves as enough documentation in the
interim.)

On Tue, May 5, 2015 at 4:47 PM, Guido van Rossum <guido at python.org> wrote:

> Yeah, but the docs don't need to be committed in time for beta 1. The
> source code should go in ASAP, especially since the PEP 492 changes will
> have to be merged in on top of them. @Thomas: which Monday were you
> shooting for? I had hoped yesterday...
>
> On Sat, May 2, 2015 at 6:52 PM, Benjamin Peterson <report at bugs.python.org>
> wrote:
>
>>
>> Benjamin Peterson added the comment:
>>
>> It certainly would be nice to have documentation.
>>
>> ----------
>>
>> _______________________________________
>> Python tracker <report at bugs.python.org>
>> <http://bugs.python.org/issue2292>
>> _______________________________________
>>
>
>
>
> --
> --Guido van Rossum (python.org/~guido)
>

----------

_______________________________________
Python tracker <report at bugs.python.org>
<http://bugs.python.org/issue2292>
_______________________________________