[issue24569] Inconsistent PEP 0448 implementation

[Vedran Čačić]

Vedran Čačić added the comment:

Benjamin, you're my hero. :-)

I'm not really at home in C source... is it possible that you have also changed

    {0:1, 0:2}

to be {0:2} (as opposed to {0:1} as it is now)? I'm completely fine with that and find it more logical (and as I said in the previous message, it matches BDFL's mental model, which is the real reference implementation of Python:), but I'm afraid backward compatibility zealots will ruin the fun.

----------

_______________________________________
Python tracker <report at bugs.python.org>
<http://bugs.python.org/issue24569>
_______________________________________