[issue23326] Remove redundant __ne__ implementations

Martin Panter report at bugs.python.org
Sat Jan 31 09:15:38 CET 2015


Martin Panter added the comment:

I looked at all the instances of __ne__() identified in the patch, and they all seem redundant with the __eq__() implementations, so I think this patch is good.

----------

_______________________________________
Python tracker <report at bugs.python.org>
<http://bugs.python.org/issue23326>
_______________________________________


More information about the Python-bugs-list mailing list