[issue2292] Missing *-unpacking generalizations

[Guido van Rossum]

Guido van Rossum added the comment:

Wait, with that f() definition I'd expect a different result from the
former -- each letter as a new arg. Right?
On Jan 26, 2015 8:42 AM, "Neil Girdhar" <report at bugs.python.org> wrote:

>
> Neil Girdhar added the comment:
>
> >>> def f(a, *b): print(list(a), list(b))
>
> ----------
>
> _______________________________________
> Python tracker <report at bugs.python.org>
> <http://bugs.python.org/issue2292>
> _______________________________________
>

----------

_______________________________________
Python tracker <report at bugs.python.org>
<http://bugs.python.org/issue2292>
_______________________________________