[issue22939] integer overflow in iterator object

[Serhiy Storchaka]

Serhiy Storchaka added the comment:

> That way a virtual sequence with PY_SSIZE_T_MAX-1 items would still work (instead of failing unexpectedly).

Actually with PY_SSIZE_T_MAX+1 items (indices from 0 to PY_SSIZE_T_MAX inclusive).

If Raymond insists I can write more complicated patch, but I don't think that we should complicate the code for this pretty hypotetical case. I'm for committing issue22939v2.patch.

----------
status: open -> pending

_______________________________________
Python tracker <report at bugs.python.org>
<http://bugs.python.org/issue22939>
_______________________________________