[issue25772] Misleading descriptions about built-in type `super.`

[Martin Panter]

Martin Panter added the comment:

I agree. I think Issue 23674 already covers this. I will try to propose some changes there.

----------
nosy: +martin.panter
resolution:  -> duplicate
status: open -> closed
superseder:  -> super() documentation isn't very clear

_______________________________________
Python tracker <report at bugs.python.org>
<http://bugs.python.org/issue25772>
_______________________________________