[issue22980] C extension naming doesn't take bitness into account

[Marc-Andre Lemburg]

Marc-Andre Lemburg added the comment:

On 16.04.2015 19:14, Marc-Andre Lemburg wrote:
> However, for plain .so files that you have on your system (which will
> mostly like not support more than 2-4 different architecture configurations
> running at the same time), I don't currently see a need to make things
> more complicated than necessary.
> 
> Perhaps you can point me to some use cases where the triple
> platform tag is really useful.

Antoine's ticket is the first in two decades to request being
able to install .so extension files side-by-side, so even if
times and platforms change, people don't seem to have a big
issues without this feature.

If you have a need, it's not really hard to build your extensions
for different architecture ABIs in different directories. We've
been doing this for years, just like everyone else.

----------

_______________________________________
Python tracker <report at bugs.python.org>
<http://bugs.python.org/issue22980>
_______________________________________