[issue23756] Tighten definition of bytes-like objects

R. David Murray report at bugs.python.org
Wed Apr 1 16:01:45 CEST 2015


R. David Murray added the comment:

I found the explanation of C-contiguous vs Fortran-contiguous helpful (and I've programmed in both of those languages, though granted not much :).  However, based on that it is not obvious to me why having a fortran-contiguous buffer prevents it from being used in the bytes-like object contexts (though granted the order might be surprising to someone who is not thinking about the memory ordering and just assuming C).

I don't have much of an opinion on the other non-glossary-entry changes, but at a quick read I'm not sure how much clarity they add, if any.

----------

_______________________________________
Python tracker <report at bugs.python.org>
<http://bugs.python.org/issue23756>
_______________________________________


More information about the Python-bugs-list mailing list