[issue21965] Add support for Memory BIO to _ssl

[Antoine Pitrou]

Antoine Pitrou added the comment:

> We can leave these undocumented at the Python level if you prefer.

I'd rather that indeed. If there's a specific need, we can expose them as a separate issue.

> Maybe just "SSLInstance", would that be better than "SSLObject"?

That doesn't sound much better :-) Ok, let's keep SSLObject then.

> I believe that the overall _ssl/ssl code could be simplified by: [snip]

That would be nice. Would that also handle e.g. socket timeouts?

> To use SSLObject as a mixin it would have to be aware of these two uses of its subclasses. It could be done but I don't think it's 100% clean either.

Fair enough. We just have to make sure to implement and test new APIs twice (e.g the version() method in issue20421).

----------

_______________________________________
Python tracker <report at bugs.python.org>
<http://bugs.python.org/issue21965>
_______________________________________