[issue19145] Inconsistent behaviour in itertools.repeat when using negative times

[Vajrasky Kok]

Vajrasky Kok added the comment:

Here is the updated patch. I try to be conservative here, preserving the current behaviour.

Negative times is same as zero.
Default value (which can be passed by omitting times) means unlimited.

I did not change the signature "repeat(object [,times])" because the only suitable default value, in my opinion, is "repeat(object [,times=<unlimited>])" which is impossible at the moment.

Well, let see what Raymond has anything to say about this.

----------
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file33681/fix_itertools_repeat_negative_number_means_0_v3.patch

_______________________________________
Python tracker <report at bugs.python.org>
<http://bugs.python.org/issue19145>
_______________________________________