[issue20653] Pickle enums by name

Ethan Furman report at bugs.python.org
Fri Feb 21 06:19:00 CET 2014


Ethan Furman added the comment:

Thanks for your comments, Eli, I'll work on getting better comments in the code.

The qualname comment is partially related to the pickling changes as it's necessary for protocol 4 (I forgot to put that comment in on the previous pickling change that addressed that issue).

I reopened because a new (or another) patch with better comments is called for; I tagged it 3.4 because I thought default was still pointing to the 3.4 series.

To answer here your other questions (which I'll also put in comments in the code):

1.  if custom pickling is desired __reduce_ex__ needs to be defined
2.  if (1) is not done, then normal pickle behavior takes place:
    i.  check if this is a mixed or pure Enum
    ii. if mixed, check that mixed-in type (aka member_type) has a pickle
        protocol in place, and if it doesn't, have the resulting enum class
        have __reduce_ex__ be the _break_on_call_reduce method.  We do this
        because even though the class and member will pickle, the member
        will fail to unpickle.
3.  as I said in an earlier message, but didn't make clear:  __reduce_ex__ is
    the preferred method.  This means that if a class has both __reduce__ and
    __reduce_ex__, __reduce__ will be ignored (at least by pickle -- I haven't
    researched copy, which I think also uses __reduce__ and/or __reduce_ex__).
    And of course, if an ancestor class has __reduce_ex__, and a subclass has
    __reduce__, the subclass really has both.  No, __reduce__ is not checked for.

----------

_______________________________________
Python tracker <report at bugs.python.org>
<http://bugs.python.org/issue20653>
_______________________________________


More information about the Python-bugs-list mailing list