[issue23014] Don't have importlib.abc.Loader.create_module() be optional

[Nick Coghlan]

Nick Coghlan added the comment:

The specific reason I wanted the "return None to delegate to the default behaviour" feature was to make it easier to migrate the C extension machinery.

With that design, a PEP 451 based C extension loader would just need to return None when there was no appropriate "Create" symbol exported from the module.

If returning None was disallowed, it would need to instead arrange to call importlib.util.module_from_spec(). That's doable, of course, but requires loaders to reimplement behaviour provided by the standard import system, rather than being able to just say "do the default thing, whatever that happens to be". That's the kind of really easy to get wrong responsibility I appreciated PEP 451 taking *away* from custom loaders.

However, I have no problem with making create_module() mandatory if the "return None to request the default behaviour" feature is retained. As you say, adding an implementation that returns None is both easy and remains compatible with Python 3.4.

----------

_______________________________________
Python tracker <report at bugs.python.org>
<http://bugs.python.org/issue23014>
_______________________________________