[issue21308] PEP 466: backport ssl changes

[Nick Coghlan]

Nick Coghlan added the comment:

The problem is that the Rietveld integration isn't able to figure out the base revision, so it isn't generating the review automatically. Times like this it would be nice to be able to specify a "base branch" explicitly...

In other news... the outcome of the Fedora thread is that Slavek is just going to go ahead and apply the patch to Python 2.7 RPMs in Fedora Rawhide next week. That will hopefully be entirely uneventful, but if it isn't, at least we'll know *before* merging it upstream :)

----------

_______________________________________
Python tracker <report at bugs.python.org>
<http://bugs.python.org/issue21308>
_______________________________________