[issue16581] define "PEP editor" in PEP 1

Chris Jerdonek report at bugs.python.org
Mon Dec 3 06:34:14 CET 2012


Chris Jerdonek added the comment:

> The "consisting" doesn't sound too well to me, maybe "reserved to"?

"Reserved for" sounds good to me.  Originally I was thinking of "limited to" or "restricted to," but that had a connotation of exclusivity I wanted to avoid.

----------

_______________________________________
Python tracker <report at bugs.python.org>
<http://bugs.python.org/issue16581>
_______________________________________


More information about the Python-bugs-list mailing list