[issue14551] imp.load_source docs removed from python3 docs...is this correct?

[Antoine Pitrou]

Antoine Pitrou <pitrou at free.fr> added the comment:

> Well, I want backwards-compatibility *now*, not forever.

I don't think changing a function signature in an incompatible way is
generally acceptable. You might make one of the arguments optional,
though (but keeping the current semantics when the argument *is*
passed). If it's not possible, you can add another function with the
intended behaviour.

The importlib bootstrapping has already had some (unavoidable)
disruptive consequences. Let's keep them to a minimum. People *rely* on
our APIs, even the less popular ones.

----------

_______________________________________
Python tracker <report at bugs.python.org>
<http://bugs.python.org/issue14551>
_______________________________________