[issue13346] re.split() should behave like string.split() for maxsplit=0 and maxsplit=-1

[Terry J. Reedy]

Terry J. Reedy <tjreedy at udel.edu> added the comment:

The two methods are defined differently, and act as defined, so this is a feature request, not a bug report.

str.split([sep[, maxsplit]]) 
... If maxsplit is given, at most maxsplit splits are done (thus, the list will have at most maxsplit+1 elements). If maxsplit is not specified, then there is no limit on the number of splits (all possible splits are made).

re.split(pattern, string, maxsplit=0, flags=0)
...If maxsplit is nonzero, at most maxsplit splits occur,

Clearly, if maxsplit for re.split is the default of 0, it must do all splits. There is a difference between being optional with no default (possible with C-coded functions) and with a default.

Logically, both should have a default of None, meaning no limit. But I agree with Ezio and do not see that happening for Python 3.

As for negative values, I would have maxsplit treated as a count and make negative values a ValueError.

----------
nosy: +terry.reedy
status: open -> closed
type: behavior -> feature request
versions:  -Python 2.7, Python 3.2

_______________________________________
Python tracker <report at bugs.python.org>
<http://bugs.python.org/issue13346>
_______________________________________