[issue10533] defaultdict constructor with a concrete value

[Steve Holden]

Steve Holden <steve at holdenweb.com> added the comment:

On 11/25/2010 1:44 PM, Łukasz Langa wrote:
> To sum up: if you don't find the idea of adding `fallbackdict'
> (possibly with an different *short* name) worth it, then I'm +1 on
> correcting the docs in terms of __missing__ and leaving the
> implementation as is.

+1

regards
 Steve
-- 
Steve Holden           +1 571 484 6266   +1 800 494 3119
PyCon 2011 Atlanta March 9-17       http://us.pycon.org/
See Python Video!       http://python.mirocommunity.org/
Holden Web LLC                 http://www.holdenweb.com/

----------

_______________________________________
Python tracker <report at bugs.python.org>
<http://bugs.python.org/issue10533>
_______________________________________