[issue7274] json module apparently fails regression found at http://json.org/JSON_checker/test.zip.

[Douglas Shawhan]

Douglas Shawhan <doug.shawhan at gmail.com> added the comment:

Fair enough. Thanks.

On Fri, Nov 6, 2009 at 5:45 PM, Bob Ippolito <report at bugs.python.org> wrote:

>
> Bob Ippolito <bob at redivi.com> added the comment:
>
> The json module departs slightly from the spec in that it will allow you
> to consume and produce documents that don't have an array or object
> envelope. This is a feature.
>
> The "Too deep" test case is just a silly thing that crockford's code
> does, there's a fixed limitation for how complex an object could be.
> That's not a regression failure and the spec doesn't say anything about
> a maximum nesting level.
>
> The json module includes all of these in its test suite, although it
> disagrees slightly with crockford on what should pass.
>
> http://svn.python.org/view/python/branches/release26-
> maint/Lib/json/tests/test_fail.py<http://svn.python.org/view/python/branches/release26-%0Amaint/Lib/json/tests/test_fail.py>
>
> SKIPS = {
>    1: "why not have a string payload?",
>    18: "spec doesn't specify any nesting limitations",
> }
>
> ----------
> resolution:  -> invalid
> status: open -> closed
>
> _______________________________________
> Python tracker <report at bugs.python.org>
> <http://bugs.python.org/issue7274>
> _______________________________________
>

----------
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file15293/unnamed

_______________________________________
Python tracker <report at bugs.python.org>
<http://bugs.python.org/issue7274>
_______________________________________
-------------- next part --------------
Fair enough. Thanks.<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Fri, Nov 6, 2009 at 5:45 PM, Bob Ippolito <span dir="ltr">&lt;<a href="mailto:report at bugs.python.org">report at bugs.python.org</a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">

<br>
Bob Ippolito &lt;<a href="mailto:bob at redivi.com">bob at redivi.com</a>&gt; added the comment:<br>
<br>
The json module departs slightly from the spec in that it will allow you<br>
to consume and produce documents that don&#39;t have an array or object<br>
envelope. This is a feature.<br>
<br>
The &quot;Too deep&quot; test case is just a silly thing that crockford&#39;s code<br>
does, there&#39;s a fixed limitation for how complex an object could be.<br>
That&#39;s not a regression failure and the spec doesn&#39;t say anything about<br>
a maximum nesting level.<br>
<br>
The json module includes all of these in its test suite, although it<br>
disagrees slightly with crockford on what should pass.<br>
<br>
<a href="http://svn.python.org/view/python/branches/release26-%0Amaint/Lib/json/tests/test_fail.py" target="_blank">http://svn.python.org/view/python/branches/release26-<br>
maint/Lib/json/tests/test_fail.py</a><br>
<br>
SKIPS = {<br>
 Â  Â 1: &quot;why not have a string payload?&quot;,<br>
 Â  Â 18: &quot;spec doesn&#39;t specify any nesting limitations&quot;,<br>
}<br>
<br>
----------<br>
resolution: Â -&gt; invalid<br>
status: open -&gt; closed<br>
<div><div></div><div class="h5"><br>
_______________________________________<br>
Python tracker &lt;<a href="mailto:report at bugs.python.org">report at bugs.python.org</a>&gt;<br>
&lt;<a href="http://bugs.python.org/issue7274" target="_blank">http://bugs.python.org/issue7274</a>&gt;<br>
_______________________________________<br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br>