[issue2636] Regexp 2.7 (modifications to current re 2.2.2)

[Matthew Barnett]

Matthew Barnett <python at mrabarnett.plus.com> added the comment:

The explanation of the zero-width bug is incorrect. What happens is this:

The functions for finditer(), findall(), etc, perform searches and want
the next one to continue from where the previous match ended. However,
if the match was actually zero-width then that would've made it search
from where the previous search _started_, and it would be stuck forever.
Therefore, after a zero-width match the caller of the search consumes a
character. Unfortunately, that can result a character being 'missed'.

The bug in re.split() is also the result of an incorrect fix to this
zero-width problem.

I suggest that the regex code should include the fix for the zero-width
split bug; we can have code to turn it off unless a re.ZEROWIDTH flag is
present, if that's the decision.

The patch issue2636+01+09-02+17+18+19+20+21+24+26_speedup.diff includes
some speedups.

Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file11669/issue2636+01+09-02+17+18+19+20+21+24+26_speedup.diff

_______________________________________
Python tracker <report at bugs.python.org>
<http://bugs.python.org/issue2636>
_______________________________________