[issue2390] Merge 2.6 ACKS with 3.0 ACKS

Benjamin Peterson report at bugs.python.org
Tue Mar 25 22:19:44 CET 2008


Benjamin Peterson <musiccomposition at gmail.com> added the comment:

On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 4:17 PM, Christian Heimes <report at bugs.python.org>
wrote:

>
> Christian Heimes <lists at cheimes.de> added the comment:
>
> For the record
>
> You don't have to merge changes from 2.6 to 3.0 manually. In fact you
> mustn't unless you explicitly block the revision with svnmerge.py. In
> general you submit a change to 2.6 and it gets merged into 3.0 later.

Thanks for the heads up. Should I block the revision then?

>
>
> __________________________________
> Tracker <report at bugs.python.org>
> <http://bugs.python.org/issue2390>
> __________________________________
>

Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file9856/unnamed

__________________________________
Tracker <report at bugs.python.org>
<http://bugs.python.org/issue2390>
__________________________________
-------------- next part --------------
An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed...
Name: unnamed
Url: http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-bugs-list/attachments/20080325/a7209495/attachment.txt 


More information about the Python-bugs-list mailing list