[issue3352] Deficiencies in multiprocessing/threading API

[Jesse Noller]

Jesse Noller <jnoller at gmail.com> added the comment:

On Tue, Aug 19, 2008 at 11:34 AM, Nick Coghlan <report at bugs.python.org> wrote:
>
> Nick Coghlan <ncoghlan at gmail.com> added the comment:
>
> is_alive appears to be a potentially expensive check for the
> multiprocessing side of things, which is why I'm inclined to leave it as
> a method. "if t.is_alive():" actually reads better to me than "if
> t.alive:" anyway.

Dang, I already cut that one over.

_______________________________________
Python tracker <report at bugs.python.org>
<http://bugs.python.org/issue3352>
_______________________________________