[ python-Feature Requests-1483384 ] Add set.member() method
SourceForge.net
noreply at sourceforge.net
Mon May 8 07:37:52 CEST 2006
Feature Requests item #1483384, was opened at 2006-05-07 10:41
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by rhettinger
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=355470&aid=1483384&group_id=5470
Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread,
including the initial issue submission, for this request,
not just the latest update.
Category: Extension Modules
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Michael Tsai (michaeltsai)
Assigned to: Raymond Hettinger (rhettinger)
Summary: Add set.member() method
Initial Comment:
Right now, when I check membership in a set, the __in__ method just
returns True/False if there is an object in the set that's == to the
argument. I would like to have a member() method that returns the object
in the set or raises KeyError if the argument is not in the set. This would
be useful for interning and other cases where right now I'd use a
degenerate dictionary where the keys and values are equal.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
>Comment By: Raymond Hettinger (rhettinger)
Date: 2006-05-08 00:37
Message:
Logged In: YES
user_id=80475
I'm curious to see some of your dictionary examples that
do not seem to tranlate cleanly with the existing set API.
In published code, I've not seen people writing anything
like what is being requested, i.e. I haven't seen
fragments like:
if x in s:
return x
else:
raise KeyError
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Comment By: Georg Brandl (gbrandl)
Date: 2006-05-07 15:36
Message:
Logged In: YES
user_id=849994
Moving to Feature Requests. Note that I do not think Raymond
will agree to this.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=355470&aid=1483384&group_id=5470
More information about the Python-bugs-list
mailing list