[ python-Bugs-1441408 ] svn head compiler fails to spot extended slicing
SourceForge.net
noreply at sourceforge.net
Fri Mar 17 19:04:23 CET 2006
Bugs item #1441408, was opened at 2006-03-02 11:20
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by ncoghlan
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=105470&aid=1441408&group_id=5470
Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread,
including the initial issue submission, for this request,
not just the latest update.
Category: Parser/Compiler
Group: None
>Status: Closed
>Resolution: Fixed
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Michael Hudson (mwh)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: svn head compiler fails to spot extended slicing
Initial Comment:
This is Python SVN HEAD:
>>> dis.dis(compile("x[::]", '', 'single'))
1 0 LOAD_NAME 0 (x)
3 SLICE+0
4 PRINT_EXPR
5 LOAD_CONST 0 (None)
8 RETURN_VALUE
This is Python 2.4:
>>> dis.dis(compile("x[::]", '', 'single'))
1 0 LOAD_NAME 0 (x)
3 LOAD_CONST 0 (None)
6 LOAD_CONST 0 (None)
9 LOAD_CONST 0 (None)
12 BUILD_SLICE 3
15 BINARY_SUBSCR
16 PRINT_EXPR
17 LOAD_CONST 0 (None)
20 RETURN_VALUE
----------------------------------------------------------------------
>Comment By: Nick Coghlan (ncoghlan)
Date: 2006-03-18 04:04
Message:
Logged In: YES
user_id=1038590
Applied 1452332 to SVN (generates an explicit None reference
for the step when the second colon is present but no
expressions is supplied for the step)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Comment By: Nick Coghlan (ncoghlan)
Date: 2006-03-17 23:45
Message:
Logged In: YES
user_id=1038590
Alternate patch that doesn't modify the AST posted as 1452332
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Comment By: Grant Olson (logistix)
Date: 2006-03-10 10:22
Message:
Logged In: YES
user_id=699438
Patch 1446847 Posted.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Comment By: Grant Olson (logistix)
Date: 2006-03-06 09:33
Message:
Logged In: YES
user_id=699438
This only happens when you have implicit slice values.
x[1:2:3] works fine. I'm finishing up a patch and will post
to sf shortly.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=105470&aid=1441408&group_id=5470
More information about the Python-bugs-list
mailing list