[ python-Feature Requests-1423082 ] lib-deprecated

SourceForge.net noreply at sourceforge.net
Sat Mar 4 04:23:01 CET 2006


Feature Requests item #1423082, was opened at 02/02/06 16:20
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by sf-robot
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=355470&aid=1423082&group_id=5470

Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread,
including the initial issue submission, for this request,
not just the latest update.
Category: Python Library
Group: None
>Status: Closed
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Jim Jewett (jimjjewett)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: lib-deprecated

Initial Comment:
obsolete modules are moved to lib-old.

deprecated modules remain in the library.

This makes the search for a relevant library more 
difficult. People browsing the code may not realize 
that they are deprecated.  (Example, I found no notice 
of deprecation within the code for rfc822.)  Even when 
the notice is there, the modules add to the number of 
alternatives, which hurts One-Obvious-Way-To-Do-It.

If these modules were moved to a deprecated directory, 
these problems would be greatly reduced.  (Ensure 
backwards compatibility by leaving the deprecated 
directory on the search path.) 

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: SourceForge Robot (sf-robot)
Date: 03/03/06 19:23

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=1312539

This Tracker item was closed automatically by the system. It was
previously set to a Pending status, and the original submitter
did not respond within 14 days (the time period specified by
the administrator of this Tracker).

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Georg Brandl (birkenfeld)
Date: 02/17/06 04:03

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=1188172

I think it's common practise to add a DeprecationWarning to
those modules which are deprecated since one or two
releases. That should be enough reminder.

You should be reading the docs anyway :)

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=355470&aid=1423082&group_id=5470


More information about the Python-bugs-list mailing list